Common Vernacular + High-Specificity Insight Framework
Common Vernacular + High-Specificity Insight Framework
Core Principle
Accessible language does not mean generic observations.
The objective is to communicate highly specific, individualized insights using simple, natural, everyday language.
The sophistication belongs in the observation itself, not in the vocabulary.
A person should never need specialized knowledge, industry jargon, or advanced terminology to understand the insight.
The insight remains precise.
The language becomes accessible.
Common Vernacular Guidelines
Use Everyday Language
Explain complex patterns using language people naturally use in conversation.
Replace technical terminology with plain descriptions whenever possible.
The reader should immediately understand what is being described without needing translation.
Describe What Happens, Not What It Is Called
Focus on the lived experience, visible pattern, reaction, habit, tendency, or outcome.
Avoid naming concepts when describing them creates more distance than clarity.
Example:
Instead of:
"Displays avoidant attachment tendencies."
Use:
"When things start feeling serious, they suddenly become harder to reach."
Prioritize Recognition Over Education
The goal is not to teach a concept.
The goal is for the reader to recognize themselves.
Readers should feel:
"That's exactly what happens."
Not:
"That's an interesting theory."
Use Concrete Reality
Describe observable situations, decisions, reactions, thoughts, conversations, patterns, and consequences.
Avoid vague traits.
Avoid abstract personality labels.
Describe reality people can immediately identify.
Speak Naturally
Write as if explaining something to a friend.
Avoid sounding academic, clinical, corporate, spiritualized, or overly intellectual.
Simple language increases impact when the insight itself is strong.
Insight Guidelines
Specificity Creates Accuracy
Every insight should describe something narrow enough that it does not apply to most people.
Broad statements feel generic.
Specific statements feel personal.
The Recognition Test
A useful insight should create immediate recognition in the intended individual.
The response should be:
"How did you know that?"
Not:
"That could apply to anyone."
Avoid Universal Human Behaviors
Do not rely on observations that nearly everyone experiences.
Examples:
Sometimes feels misunderstood
Wants to be appreciated
Has experienced disappointment
Can be hard on themselves
These are too common to create recognition.
Describe Distinct Patterns
Focus on recurring patterns that make the individual different from the average person.
Look for:
Repeated decision-making habits
Predictable reactions
Unique contradictions
Consistent blind spots
Characteristic strengths
Distinct coping mechanisms
Specific relational dynamics
Recognizable thought patterns
Unique ways of handling success, pressure, conflict, uncertainty, attention, responsibility, or intimacy
The Crowd Test
For any insight, imagine presenting it to ten random people.
A strong insight is one where most people would say:
"That's not me."
While the intended individual would say:
"That is exactly me."
If nearly everyone agrees with the statement, it is probably too generic.
The Specificity Rule
The more universal the language becomes, the more specific the observation must become.
Simple language requires stronger precision.
If the wording is accessible to everyone, the insight itself must be individualized enough that only the right person feels exposed by it.
Success Standard
The ideal output feels easy to read but impossible to mistake for someone else.
The reader understands it immediately.
The intended individual recognizes themselves immediately.
Both happen at the same time.
Comments
Post a Comment